Tuesday 26 December 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Put a sock in it, Wittgenstein, we're talking snark here!
I submit for your perusal the word uffish in the above lines. Lewis Carroll explained it thus: "it (uffish) seemed to suggest a state ...
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgeIhphyNAnPs-Gu6q-ANfi2CpBzXo4v_R3_1UVSIeYGeyYDmwikpl6-EyK_LXfEC3j43ia-XaNef_MYvvsNqU4fAU9PNAW5CRqkQnc_a7iTczrnUCGcBHJcLn1h6ya5AAw3yG_jtj5ifL3/s320/Hunting_Snark_interior_Page_43_1.jpg)
-
We're frolicking through yet another exegesis of my Snark GN … deep in the anapestic bowels of Fit the Second … We have arrived now at ...
-
Oh, you silly, mad, impetuous boy of a Bellman, of course you’ve heard it before! Your sense of exactitude may be lacking but as we shall de...
-
Martin Gardner, in his indispensible Annotated Snark, cites Eric Partridge’s assertion that the Baker’s use of antediluvian is "one o...
No comments:
Post a Comment